Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This section provides information, resources and guidance for supervisors on identifying students' training needs

Training Needs Analysis: Introduction

Carrying out a training needs analysis (TNA) with your DPhil student will help assess the competencies they will need to carry out their DPhil and ultimately take the first steps towards their career. It will identify, prioritise and record the discipline-specific, research and broader skills and experience they need to develop. 

Research Councils expect us as a research organisation to have mechanisms in place to assess and monitor individual student training needs, and to provide individually appropriate training and development opportunities. The resources provided here have been designed to support you in meeting this expectation.

Although it’s known as a ‘training needs analysis’, it should really be called a ‘learning needs analysis’. Skills and experience are developed not only through attending formal training/ events but also in more informal ways in collaboration with supervisors and colleagues; much of these activities will take place as a matter of course during the student’s day to day work.

What is a training needs analysis (TNA) and why should a supervisor be responsible for it?

It is a tool to help students and supervisors review, prioritise and plan for the skills and experience that the student needs to learn and develop in order to:

  • make the best possible start to their DPhil research and go on to complete a DPhil that meets their own and the University’s expectations within their funded period
  • carry out and communicate about their research
  • prepare to take the next steps to a successful and fulfilling career  – be this into a postdoctoral position or into one of a range of other career pathways

The student should take ownership of their own learning and development and drive the TNA process. The supervisor should support the student in carrying out the learning review and planning.

How does one carry out a TNA and what resources are available?

The following resources are available:

As an additional resource, training courses for DPhil students in the MPLS Division have been organised into a framework of phases and categories to guide students through the broad periods of the doctorate, and to support decisions on which skills to develop at which stage. There are further details here. The framework is intended to act as a guide and is not prescriptive.

You might also find it useful to see what is available from other training providers in the University: https://www.mpls.ox.ac.uk/training/support-from-university-researchers

Carrying out a TNA with your student:

The MPLS TNA is structured around a set of core skills that MPLS academics have identified as essential to becoming a good researcher, and sets advisory standards as guidance. It has also been designed so that students and their supervisors can add and tailor skills and experience in line with the student’s individual and discipline needs and aspirations.

For each skill, consider and discuss together the student’s current level of competency against the standards guidance and identify any gaps. Discuss which of the identified skills gaps should be prioritised for action, and what action should be taken – eg attend a training course, or any other way of developing the particular skill or experience. The student should complete the relevant sections of the TNA form as a record of the discussion.

HOW OFTEN SHOULD THIS HAPPEN AND HOW TO FOLLOW UP ON IT?

Students should begin thinking about their learning needs at an early stage, so that they make the best possible start and maintain progress with their DPhil research, and because core skills are reviewed at Transfer of Status. A meeting during the first weeks of the student’s DPhil to get this process going is advisable. The Project Initiation Plan is another tool to help with this.

The TNA should be seen as a living and evolving work and should be reviewed by you and the student regularly throughout the DPhil. How often this should happen depends on what you and they consider to be appropriate for their individual situation, but the division recommends a review at least once a year and preferably more often.

During a review you should discuss what progress has been made on the learning needs identified previously, and discuss which new priorities should be addressed.

Where is it logged, how is it monitored / reported on?

The critical aspect is to make sure that the TNA is continually evolving and moving forwards as the student progresses; the student, with their supervisor, should be reviewing and updating it regularly.

The work done on the TNA can feed into the relevant regular GSS reporting and it will be referenced in the new Graduate Supervision System.

Remember that Research Councils expect us as a research organisation to have mechanisms in place to assess and monitor individual student training needs, and to provide individually appropriate training and development opportunities.