Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

I just came across this here 'De-Jarganizer' tool whilst skimming through Twitter - as you do: 

http://scienceandpublic.com/.

I thoroughly dig this de-jargonizer #SciComm tool (https://t.co/y9xUo5YW1f). Here's a screen shot of it in action on some of my own work: pic.twitter.com/V7tKg3Hvyx

— Tyler J Ford (@TyFordFever) August 24, 2017

It's often rule number one (once you've figured out what the point of an article is and who your audience is) to make sure that you avoid jargon where possible. It's tough because we're trained to communicate in a way that makes sense, and generally most people around us understand, or the confidence to work it out - but it can be a massive turn off for anyone not in the know. I'm always telling people it's the ideas that matter, and knowledge isn't intelligence, so you can make your writing so much more engaging by thinking carefully about the best, most accessible way of the concepts and ideas you want to get across. So it's wonderful that such a tool has come along as it can be quite hard to judge when something is or isn't jargon or just complicated language.

It looks pretty cool; have a look - you can just copy and paste text in, or upload a file and it spits out a fairly basic measure, highlights words to look again at, etc.

dejargon.png

This one was developed on the basis of articles published by the BBC and intended specifically to be scientist friendly, you can read more about that here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0181742.

There's a hundred and one tools out there to help assess writing, including https://readable.io/text/.

If you use it, let us know how you found it - would you recommend it compared to other tools?

Below are some 'top tips' that we put together when helping researchers write very brief synopses of their research for an event:.

You might find this guide handy but some top tips are:

  • Write in the active, not the passive.
  • Don’t use a big word when a singularly unloquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity.
  • Use short sentences.
  • Avoid jargon and acronym soup: try using the 'Up-Goer V' editor to strip your text of words that aren't common in plain english: http://splasho.com/upgoer5/ .
  • Does it pass the ‘Hey!’ test? If you put ‘Hey!’ in front of your first sentence, does the tone and style still work?
  • Think really carefully about what concepts or ideas are important to get across rather than details – but also think about what non-specialists are likely to know about.
  • Use a tool to check to readability score.