Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

I just came across this here 'De-Jarganizer' tool whilst skimming through Twitter - as you do:

I thoroughly dig this de-jargonizer #SciComm tool ( Here's a screen shot of it in action on some of my own work:

— Tyler J Ford (@TyFordFever) August 24, 2017






It's often rule number one (once you've figured out what the point of an article is and who your audience is) to make sure that you avoid jargon where possible when communicating to a non-specialist audience. It's tough because we're trained to communicate in a way that makes sense within our disciplines, and generally most people around us understand, or have the confidence to work it out - but it can be a massive turn off for anyone not 'in the know'. I'm always telling people it's the ideas that matter, and knowledge isn't intelligence, so you can make your writing so much more engaging by thinking carefully about the best, most accessible way to convey the concepts and ideas you want to get across. So it's wonderful that such a tool has come along as it can be quite hard to judge when something is or isn't jargon or just complicated language.

It looks pretty cool; have a look - you can just copy and paste text in, or upload a file and it spits out a fairly basic measure, highlights words to look again at, etc.

A screenshot of the dejargonizer tool

A screenshot of the dejargonizer tool with read outs on the proportion of rare and common words, giving a score as suitability for general audience - the example shows this as 92 and the dial at the top is in the 'green' range (as opposed to the amber or red ranges).

This one was developed on the basis of articles published by the BBC and intended specifically to be scientist friendly.

There's a hundred and one tools out there to help assess writing, including

If you use it, let us know how you found it - would you recommend it compared to other tools?

Below are some 'top tips' that we put together when helping researchers write very brief synopses of their research for an event:.

Some top tips are:

  • Write in the active, not the passive.
  • Don’t use a big word when a singularly unloquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity.
  • Use short sentences.
  • Avoid jargon and acronym soup: try using the 'Up-Goer V' editor to strip your text of words that aren't common in plain english: .
  • Does it pass the ‘Hey!’ test? If you put ‘Hey!’ in front of your first sentence, does the tone and style still work?
  • Think really carefully about what concepts or ideas are important to get across rather than details – but also think about what non-specialists are likely to know about.
  • Use a tool to check to readability score.